Posts Tagged ‘google’

Articles

Google’s 23 Questions Applied To Programming

In Google on July 3, 2011 by radioray1025 Tagged:

If you don’t monitor the web world and what’s going on in social media, you don’t hear or see the angst every time Google decides to change something in the search algorithm.   Think of it the same way radio programmers respond to a PPM or diary methodology change.  Remember that stress.  Now recognize with Google, they are planning more than 500 separate changes in 2011.

We’re ready to shoot the ARB gods now.  Perhaps praising them for not screwing around with the rules every 10 minutes would be better.

Google is really focused on the consumer.  Same place we should be both in our on air and on line products.  Here’s a list of the infamous Google 23 questions.  These, and the follow ups to them, are what’s behind Google’s constantly evolving platform.  Looking at the questions, they would be great fodder to consider when you think about your audience too.  Change the word “article or page” to “personality, show or station” and you have a textbook way to look at your programming.

  • Would you trust the information presented in this article (by this station)?
  • Is (station’s content) this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
  • Does the site (station) have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
  • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
  • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
  • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of (listeners to the station) readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
  • Does the article (Do the topics) provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
  • Does the page (Does the station) provide substantial value when compared to other (stations) pages in search results?
  • How much quality control is done on content?
  • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
  • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Was the (content) article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
  • Would you recognize this (station) site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
  • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • Is this the sort of (station)page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Does this (station) article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
  • Are the articles (content breaks) short, unsubstantial, or otherwise (trivial)  lacking in helpful specifics?
  • Are the pages (Is the show) produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
  • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

It’s not a perfect match to radio’s needs, but this shows the depth Google goes to satisfy customers.  I highlighted the questions that seem to apply to me. Perhaps if we spent more time focused on the listener than the measurement method, our results would be better too.

Advertisements

Statuses

Have You “+1” Today?

In Facebook on June 4, 2011 by radioray1025 Tagged:

The +1 Button In Action On Today’s Country Online On Blogger.

The +1 Button on A&O

Early thinking about the new Google +1 functionality for websites has marketers jumping all over the idea. Why not? There is some train of thought that the button will influence search engine rankings. If you run a real business, not radio, getting a search engine rank for your website is a really big deal.

Most station sites are aggregators by nature. There are so many java apps providing banner ads, what played last, what promotions are happening, that the pages aren’t really about any one item that effects keyword and therefore Google rank. At the station level +1 doesn’t seem like it will be terribly useful.

EXCEPT in this instance.

Google calls the +1 button “shorthand for ‘this is pretty cool’ or ‘you should check this out’

One a user clicks the button, a link to the content appears under the +1’s tab on the user’s Google Profile.

Here’s where it can get interesting. This does have a programming and ratings implication, so hang with me.

Car dealer “A” has a product they want to sell.

Your stations Google profile (yes you need one for this) “+1” the page with the deal on it.

Bill, who is looking for a car, finds the car dealer at the top of the Google search engine for “cheap cars that will last 100,000 miles” keyword.

Under the keyword is your (and all Bill’s buddies) “+1” note

Bill has liked your station. He’s ready to buy a car. He sees an endorsement from you (the +1) VERY CLOSE to his decision of where to go. He likes you. He likes others on his list. He goes to car dealer “A”

Think of +1 like you would the ads that appear in your Facebook account. The ones that say “so and so” of your friends also liked the three toed African slug.

+1’s show when Google user “A” has a connection to you on Google. Like, You Tube for example. A subscriber to your You Tube channel is a connection.

See why this might have implication for marketing your radio station. Anytime you can get in front of listeners is a bonus. When you can do it for free, it’s a BIG bonus. Besides, having the number “1” beside your name can’t be a bad thing.